EN 301 549 5.4 -- Preservation of Accessibility Information
What It Is
ETSI EN 301 549 v3.2.1 clause 5.4 -- "Preservation of accessibility information during conversion" -- says that where ICT converts information or communication, it shall preserve all documented non-proprietary accessibility information, to the extent that the destination format can carry it[1]. The obligation attaches to the converter, not the author. Export, import, save-as, copy-paste, transcoding, server-side rewriting, and file-format conversion all count as "conversion" for the purpose of this clause.
Why It Matters
Accessibility metadata is carried in format-specific slots -- the PDF structure tree, the HTML alt attribute, the lang attribute, the <th> / scope association on a table header, the WebVTT cue track on a video, the EPUB Navigation Document. A converter that reads the source but does not know about those slots drops them on the floor. The failure modes are specific and repeatable:
- Exporting a tagged PDF to Word through a generic extractor and losing the heading level tree, so a screen reader can no longer jump by heading.
- Copying an HTML table with
<th scope="col">headers into a Google Doc that rebuilds it as a plain<table>with no header association. - Saving an EPUB with a Navigation Document and
epub:typelandmarks to a flat.txtfile, which destroys every structural cue at once. - Converting a Word document with alt text on an inline image to a PDF whose image object has no
/Altentry. - Converting
.docxto.htmlthrough a library that emits<p>for every paragraph and dropslang, list semantics, and heading levels. - Email gateways rewriting HTML to inline-styled tables and stripping
role,alt, andlangin the process.
How It Relates to WCAG
WCAG conformance attaches to the final rendered output. Clause 5.4 fills a gap WCAG does not address -- it assigns the duty to the tool in the middle of the pipeline[1]. A converter that satisfies 5.4 does not by itself produce WCAG-conformant content, but it stops silently damaging accessible content produced upstream. When a document arrives at its final destination broken, 5.4 is the clause that points at the converter rather than the original author.
Practical Implications
- When implementing a format converter, pick libraries that map accessibility metadata slot-for-slot: alt text, heading levels, list semantics, table header association, language attributes, ARIA landmarks or their document-format equivalents (PDF structure types, EPUB
epub:type, DOCX styles). - Test round-trips with assistive technology, not visual diff. A file that renders identically in a viewer can still have lost its tag tree. Open the converted output in a screen reader and navigate by heading, landmark, and table header.
- Treat any conversion that drops to a format with fewer accessibility slots (HTML to plain text, tagged PDF to flat PDF, DOCX to RTF) as lossy by definition and warn the user before it runs.
- CMS render pipelines, email gateways, and ingest-and-republish workflows are conversion steps under 5.4 even when the user thinks of them as "just saving." Audit each hop.
- Video transcoders must carry caption tracks and audio description tracks through the transcode, not re-encode the picture and drop the sidecar.
Related Clauses
Sources
- ETSI EN 301 549 v3.2.1, clause 5.4 "Preservation of accessibility information during conversion"[1]
- W3C ATAG 2.0 (parallel guidance for authoring tools)